Google's agentic development platform (IDE + Manager surface)

Moonshift vs. Antigravity

Antigravity is a Google IDE that lets you orchestrate multiple Gemini agents in parallel. Moonshift turns one prompt into a deployed Next.js app, repo, database, and launch kit.

Try Moonshift free See the breakdown

Feature-by-feature

What you actually get from each

Each row names a real thing operators ask about. No category-coded badges, no `we win everything` rows. If Antigravity is better at something we say so.

Capability

Antigravity

Moonshift

Generates full app from one prompt

If you want a product not files on disk, this matters.

Multi-agent scaffold

Deploys the app

Code without a live URL is not a launched product.

Your Vercel

Pushes to your GitHub

Long-term home should be your account.

Manual

Database wired in

Real apps persist data; setup is annoying.

Turso

Auth scaffold

Better Auth

Launch kit drafted

Posts, images, hero copy take longer than the build.

Multi-agent orchestration

Some work parallelises across many small tasks.

Manager Surface

Fixed 14-agent pipeline

Free tier sufficient for real work

Builders without budget should still be able to ship.

Preview is free

Welcome 5,000 moons

Per-run cost cap

Open-ended agent loops can burn dollars overnight.

Quota / credit based

Side-by-side

Where the two diverge

Editor + Manager vs deployed pipeline

Antigravity offers two surfaces: an Editor View for hands-on coding with an AI-powered IDE, and a Manager Surface where you spawn, orchestrate, and observe multiple agents working asynchronously. Moonshift is a deterministic 14-stage pipeline that runs server-side and ships a deployed product. Antigravity is closer to a workshop where you watch the agents work; Moonshift is closer to a factory that hands you the finished product.

Tie: Different mental models; pick the one that fits your workflow

Model access

Antigravity exposes Gemini 3.5 Flash (the IO 2026 release), Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, and GPT-OSS 120B with rate limits even on the free Preview tier. Moonshift routes models per-agent (planner, frontend, validator, marketer each use the model tuned for the job); you do not pick the model per prompt. If you want explicit per-prompt model selection on Gemini 3, Antigravity is the right tool.

Antigravity: Direct multi-model picker on every prompt

Pricing

Antigravity Preview is free (rate-limited) while in preview. Pro is $20/month for the standard tier; Google added an AI Ultra plan at $200/month (reduced from $250) for 20x the Pro quota. There is no separate Antigravity subscription; the tiers are part of the Google AI subscription bundle. Moonshift Pro is $99/month for 35,000 moons (~50 full launches) and includes deploy + DB + launch kit at no surcharge.

Moonshift: Pipeline output included, no Vercel/DB setup on top

Antigravity 2.0 at IO 2026

At Google IO on May 19, 2026, Google launched Antigravity 2.0 with an updated desktop app, a CLI tool, and an SDK for custom workflows. The release is built around Gemini 3.5 Flash, co-developed in Antigravity itself. The CLI + SDK direction signals Antigravity is moving toward a platform for building agents, not just running them. For Moonshift users this is largely orthogonal; the two products serve different parts of the lifecycle.

Antigravity: Aggressive platform direction with the 2.0 release

Launch kit and distribution

Antigravity gives you code and a running app; it does not draft your launch post, render your hero image, or stage your X thread. Moonshift's marketer agent writes a 5-tweet X thread and a long-form LinkedIn post in your voice during the build. The image-gen agent renders three card sizes. The publisher agent stages everything behind a HITL approval gate so nothing posts without your sign-off.

Moonshift: Distribution is part of the build, not a follow-up TODO

What lands in your hands

After the build finishes

Antigravity output

Multi-agent IDE session with Editor + Manager surfaces
Direct access to Gemini 3.5 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.6, Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-OSS 120B
CLI tool + SDK for custom agent workflows (Antigravity 2.0)
Asynchronous parallel agent runs across branches

Moonshift output

Deployed app on your Vercel account at your domain
GitHub repo pushed to your account, not ours
Turso database with schema, seeded, migrated
Auth, sessions, password reset wired in
Landing page copy and hero image, on-brand
X thread (5 tweets) and LinkedIn post drafted
Three image prompts rendered for social cards

Pricing, honestly

What you pay, and what it actually gets you

Public pricing as of 2026-05. Updated when either side changes.

Antigravity pricing

Preview$0

Free while in preview. All models available with rate limits.

Pro$20

Standard quota; bundled with the broader Google AI Pro subscription.

AI Ultra$200

20x the Pro quota; targeted at heavy users. Reduced from $250 in 2026.

Moonshift pricing

Welcome trial$0

5,000 welcome moons on sign-up (~7 full launches). No card. One-time grant.

Hobby$19

5,000 moons/month (~7 launches). Every launch feature unlocked. Custom domains. Your Vercel + GitHub + Turso.

Starter$49

15,000 moons/month (~21 launches). Adds iterate-tab (chat-turn editing) + run scrub & replay.

Pro$99

35,000 moons/month (~50 launches). Adds full-mode (deeper reasoning) + cinematic landing agent included. Priority support.

Frequently asked

Antigravity vs Moonshift, common questions

Is Antigravity actually free?

The Preview tier is free while the product is in preview, with rate limits across all available models. Heavy users typically move to Pro ($20) or AI Ultra ($200). Moonshift's welcome trial gives 5,000 moons (~7 full launches) with no card, which is a different shape of free.

What is the Manager Surface?

Antigravity's Manager Surface is a dedicated UI where you spawn, orchestrate, and observe multiple agents running asynchronously across different workspaces or branches. It is the most novel piece of Antigravity vs traditional editor-only agents like Cursor or Claude Code.

Does Antigravity replace Cursor for me?

Depends on how much you value the multi-agent Manager Surface and Gemini 3.x models vs Cursor's editor-tuned model routing. Many builders run both.

How does Moonshift's iterate flow compare to Antigravity?

Moonshift iterate runs through the same agent pipeline that generated your app; it is good for whole-route changes (add a settings page, swap auth provider, regenerate landing). Antigravity is closer to a multi-agent IDE; better for granular file-level work on a project you are actively maintaining.

Can I use Gemini models in Moonshift?

The frontend agent uses a frontier coding model and the validator uses a high-reasoning model. You do not pick the model per prompt; the pipeline routes to the best model per phase. If you want explicit Gemini 3.5 Flash access on every keystroke, Antigravity is the right tool.

The verdict

Pick Moonshift when

Pick Moonshift when you are starting from a prompt and want a launched product on your Vercel, with a real GitHub repo, Turso database, and drafted X + LinkedIn posts. The output is meant to ship, not to keep editing.

Pick Antigravity when

Pick Antigravity when you want a Google-stack IDE that can spawn and observe many agents working in parallel on different branches. The 2.0 release at IO 2026 added a CLI, an SDK, and Gemini 3.5 Flash; the Manager Surface is genuinely new compared to typical editor agents.

Bottom line

Antigravity is the Google answer to Claude Code + Cursor. Moonshift is a zero-to-deployed product pipeline. Different categories; many builders run both.

Stop at the deploy, or keep going until launch.

Moonshift builds the app and drafts the launch in one run. You approve. The first user sees a post you would actually publish.

Start with Moonshift See pricing

We do not pretend to win every comparison. Cursor is better for IDE work, v0 for components, Base44 for Play Store. Moonshift is the only one that ships your launch posts with the build.